|
I got my
start in the publishing business as a golf pro, and
if that sounds peculiar, lemmesplain: I liked to
teach more than anything, and I had developed my
interest in writing from my late and great Uncle
George and high school English teacher, Mary
Delsrude. I putted like Godzilla, so given the
happenstance of an illness in the family that
required my attention for a couple of years, I gave
up the golf profession and decided to enroll at Ole
Miss. Decided there that I'd write for a living, or
at least for a career. (Writing is one of the very
few professions where one never has to actually
make any money, or even finish anything for that
matter, and still be looked upon as having a
legitimate occupation.)
Not only was
I one of the elder underclassmen at this fine
(really...) school, I think I was among the very
few without a BMW, but the rest of that part will
be saved for more stories.
Anyhow, the
short version of the long story is that I was
graduated (I learned to say it that corrected way,
so tuition, I'm thinking, was a bargain) and went
to work with a start up upstart golf magazine run
by two idjut galoots (and that there is a bundle of
story potential for other times). These folks, I'll
call them Dumb and Numb, nearly drove the
publication into the ground, but before that
happened I learned to work with professional
"knowers" as a professional "doer." These folks I
worked with on behalf of the magazine, mostly PGA
and LPGA touring professionals, had a tremendous
amount of knowledge to go along with their awesome
skills, but ran into difficulty relaying that
knowledge to others such that people could use it
to improve their own golf games. I'm not at all
knocking any of these pros because I'd rather just
be good any day than have to be able to tell why,
but I found that a lot of them didn't really know
what it was that they did that made them so good.
That is where and how my prior professional
background came in: I could look and see what they
did and knew enough about it to ask the right
questions.
I'd rather be
able to just do something rather than only know
about it, but what it is that I "just do" is
know... I've said a few different times that I do
not (in no way) ever claim to know everything, but
I claim to know those who do, and, more
importantly, I know what and how to ask them about
it so I can bridge it on through to whoever reads
my stuff. That, in a droplet, is me and what I do
(or at least how I see it).
To the man
(or woman) all these pros credited me with making
them look like wizards in print, and now I'm
bragging, but why not -- our readers said that mine
was the best golf instruction they'd ever read, and
that, to me, was saying something considering that
there are (vicinity) 4000 books written on golf.
The pros also commented to me that I was the first
writer they'd ever worked with who really
understood anything they talked about, let alone be
able to dissect their answers into more questions,
and then reassemble that into more detailed
answers. I think I was also the first writer they'd
worked with who could break par.
"Write about
what you know." That was told to me by every
writing instructor I ever had, and squeezed in
somewhere into every book or article I ever read on
the topic. I knew golf, and I knew how to write. I,
therefore, wrote about golf. Well, I also know
shooting.
After Numb
and Dumb at the magazine angered me to the point I
could no longer work for them, I carted myself off
to start my own publishing business. I went with
shooting because, mostly, there wasn't anyone doing
it. It amazed me that there were as many
competitive shooters as there were (and still are)
and yet no one had considered, or at least done, a
good book with a championship level shooter telling
all about how and what he did to win championships.
Working with
shooters is the same as working with golfers, or
working with anyone who does something well enough
that others want to learn from -- ask the right
questions, understand the answers well enough to
ask some more questions, and then go home and write
it all up. Then take some photographs that are
germaine to the topic, and also attractive, and
then design and lay out the bookso it looks nice
(and is nice) to read.
It's a simple
thing, from my perspective. I've had the good
fortune to have developed some good associations
with people like David Tubb and also to have had
unwavering support from a few folks who inspired
and encouraged me all along.
The one thing
I can do differently from some "name" shooter is
provide different perspectives. When you read a
book by David Tubb, you get (and expect to get) his
opinion and advice on his equipment and techniques.
That's a wonderful thing. Only a moron would pass
on information offered by the likes of David.
However, and I could be paraphrasing this from his
book Highpower Rifle so certainly it's not being
said as a knock, everyone needs to find his or her
own way. David experiments continually, and,
continually, he's keeping, changing, throwing out,
and modifying again some elements of shooting
technique and equipment. That means he's learning
for himself. See, we need to listen to people like
David because he, obviously, knows how to shoot
really high scores, but what we really need to
listen to is their assessment of the "process" that
led to the championships. That process will be
filled with a series of trials and errors,
sometimes following a plan, sometimes not, but
there nonetheless. I get the opportunity to gain
different perspectives since I work with different
people, and since I work (continually) on myself.
One reason,
by the way, that I don't stay as much "up" on some
minor things as do others in my profession is
simply because I am always trying to shoot higher
scores my own self! Simply put: I don't have time
or inclination to mess with things that don't look
to be in my best interests. That's why some people
seem shocked that I haven't tried every bullet,
powder, cleaning goop, or whathaveyou, but I'm
trying to find the best thing for me to use, and
when I get a hold of what I think that is, it has
to be disproven (and usually by others) before I'll
head that direction and decide for myself. For
instance, I was really happy with old fashioned gun
powder until I had heard enough folks going on
about Viht. Then I tried it to see for myself. I,
however, felt no tug to try it when it first hit
the market. I, so to speak, try to "clean up" after
some of these folks and then hand it on over to
you. That's the best service I can do, in my mind,
in helping the most folks the most.
Aside from
anything in the above that might matter, things
that really don't matter include that I also used
to race motorcycles because I couldn't afford to
race cars. I was fairly fast and just et it up --
lived for it. I hurt myself many times and it still
hurts. But it sure was fun. I'm a big auto racing
in general and supercross spectator; Formula One is
my favorite. I grew up on a cattle ranch in a
really little, really dusty town called Grand
Valley in western Colorado. We were known primarily
for our speed trap. There was, at that time, one
paved street and that was Highway 6&24. We
didn't have to climb a pole to answer the
telephone, but we didn't have to dial a prefix to
talk to a neighbor. I didn't have television until
1968 and then we had one channel that went off the
air after the ten o'clock news. It's a wonder I
ever learned to operate a computer.
I'm through
talking about myself now since anything more you
want to know about me is likely to be answered
through things I publish elsewhere. If you want to
know anything else about me you can ask. Otherwise,
mind your own damn bidness (sorry, but I still have
a heaping helping of western Colorado
standoffishness to filter my spells of coziness and
cooperation).
|